InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 51
Posts 3993
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/30/2014

Re: BottomBounce post# 283731

Friday, 09/20/2019 10:07:24 PM

Friday, September 20, 2019 10:07:24 PM

Post# of 290029
bwaaahaaahaahaahaha...

I particularly liked the comment section...

Quote;

one thing us "old timers" know is to be very wary of anonymous articles posted by anonymous people.

for example, this is the only mention of the cultivation aspect or the extraction labs.

"TRTC is also involved in the agricultural side of cannabis, a move that exposes it to every stage of the marijuana value chain from seed to sale."

what I don't see;

* a mention of blüm/san leandro having an extraction lab or production facility.
* a mention of blüm/oak having a cultivation operation, an extraction lab / production facilities.
* a mention of the company owned Hegenberger greenhouse and lab facility expected to be operational in mid '18
* a mention of the company Carnegie warehouse property
* a mention of the Panther Gap Farms lease agreement, up to (44k sq ft) of cultivation space
* a mention of The Farm, Cultivar Inc lease agreement, up to (244k sq ft) of cultivation space
* a mention of NV also being recreational legal
* a mention of the NuLeaf partnership with a (30k sq ft) cultivation facility and a (15k sq ft) production facility
* a mention of the 4 remaining NV licenses, (2) for cultivation and (2) for extraction labs
* a mention of EG's massive state of the art Greenhouse facility in NJ or the fact NJ is about to expand their program
* a mention of EG at all
* a mention of the massive increase in shareholder value

I could go on but let’s get to the ridiculous conclusions and assumptions.
Let's start here;


"...An increase in outstanding shares results in a decline in share price. This dilutes stock. If a hypothetical company’s share price is $10 and it has 1000 outstanding shares, it is worth $10,000 ($10 multiplied by 1000). If the worth of the company remains unchanged at $10,000, creating an additional 1000 shares (to bring total outstanding shares to 2000) will automatically cause the share price to decline to $5 (as $5 multiplied by 2000 is $10,000). This hypothetical example illustrates the dilutive impact of creating new shares on a company’s share price..."

the worth of the company does NOT go "unchanged", it increases by the number of new shares multiplied by the pps.

https://finance.zacks.com/happens-share-price-new-shares...

now this;

"...To avert foreclosure and stay in business, the only foreseeable play for TRTC will be to effect a reverse split..."

hardly the only foreseeable play, no mention of the cash on hand or the big increase in revenues from the expansions or the big increase in margins due to the "seed to sale" approach.

or this;

"...it is difficult to understand why Peterson does not see the correlation between convertible notes and eroded shareholder value..."

they mean "massively increased" shareholder value

and then there's this;

"...It makes you wonder what the objective of the company is, if not to enrich a few people..."

which I find hilarious, 'cause the article makes a person wonder what the objective of this crap opinion piece is, if not to enrich a few "flippers".

OMG, can't forget this;

"...What is certain is that TRTC is a strong sell. The massive stock dilution that has taken place over the past five years greatly limits the chance that this stock will deliver any solid long-term growth for investors..."

just ridiculous...

how can I finish this and not mention the website disclaimer? Answer - I can't.

"...not guaranteed to be accurate or all-inclusive..."

Sums this "crap" piece up pretty good, I think.
bwaaahaaahaahaahaha...

Please, for your own sake people, do your own DD!

business is blüming!!!

Opinions, everybody has one!